Lucifer
gene pool and the Darwin Award
From: holderlin66
Date: Wed Feb 4, 2004 12:28 pm
Subject: gene pool and the Darwin Award
Bradford comments;
Let me give you an example of how science
works and how I became a candidate for the Darwin Award. I had
been researching an insight that there were links, semi Darwinian
links, to ancient Atlantis. We could arrive at the idea that
humanity had ascended from a kind of etheric soup. Yet this etheric
soup, pond scum, was organized or was chaos, as life is potent
before formative forces, cosmic forces, get organized and take
hold.
Anyways I have always had Scott-Elliots maps
of Atlantis as a reminder of sort of an elaboration of what existed
between Africa and the East Coast of America. With Steiner we
had understood that Etheric Teachers, Teachers in etheric bodies,
advanced beings from the various planets had taught at the several
Atlantean island mystery centers. The form and flexibility of
those ancient times was very different in form and flexiblility
that our current skeletal systems now maintain. We were not likely
to recover dense bone formations from Atlantean ancestors to
prove the case. Rather a far more fluid, etheric, amphibian quality
might be imagined as part of the etheric capacity and matter
shaping abilities.
Which, still going along the wrong direction
of research, I remembered an aspect of "Vril" written
by the now famous award winning, Lytton awards. Lytton awards
are given for the worst melodramatic fiction, examples of horribly
written, prosy, outdated, poetic, flowery and worse than the
infatuation with German pastries, story telling. There of course
we find that "Zanoni" and "Vril" stand there
along with "The Last Days of Pompei" and one wonders,
when this guy Lytton ever had time to sleep? We also face the
interesting dismissal of Lytton as a useless writer or researcher.
Not unlike the slaps on the wrist we get from those who consider
Steiner an air-head.
Bulwer, like Steiner, has gotten very bad
press - even when we have deeply absorbed "Zanoni"
and we come rushing back to Joel's latest descriptions of biography
and the human double.. still the encounter in "Zanoni"
is a classic insight that is dumped out along with the Lytton
awards the baby and the bathwater.
All of this naturally gets filed where Transylvania,
Count St. Germain and Christian Rosenkreutz are destined to be
filed. Vampires would have far more validity than a mysterious
Initiate rumored to have lived in Transylvania. All of this is
destined to be tossed out on a heap of hype against anything
worthy of our interest or profound examples of scientific reserarch.
There was no Atlantis, there are no Initiates higher than Professor
Gumbo the Science Guy.
But, let me return to Science. So we understand
that frogs, birds, lizards and crocks have a wide eye, non-aligned,
pre- I AM - non- extistant, brain centering, vanishing point.
The vanishing point is something that brings our Eye and our
I AM into the center of our brain capacity. This vanishing point
was most clearly understood from observing the struggles of Giotto's
Art. Egyptian Art reveal a two dimensional, disconnected Eye,
as viewing things from one side of the eye, using sideways, half/brain
observational skills. This three dimensional capacity to draw,
as a skill, burst forth innocently with Giotto struggles in his
Art.
So there were a great deal of insights from
the ancient past that reveal the shape of Kingly crowns, rear
crowns, Feathered crowns, kings crowns, Bali Crowns that point
to hidden psychic fields outside the skull form. Eye vision and
Kingly command that were once still outside of the human skull
were once seen with higher vision. These ancient crowns reveal
rear brain and forebrain development shifts and a gradual solidification
of the skull and encasing of the brain and faculties inside the
skull of the current human form. We were not always so dense
as we are now. Nor were we all so self contained as we are now.
So picturing the Atlantean basis of the earliest
human form brought me toward the Amphibian understanding of frogs.
The frog skull, the etheric sliminess of frogness..Anyways there
were indications, all pointers and signposts that pointed up
the wrong street all by the wrong people but still I needed to
take a look. I realize how strange this sounds, but bear with
me for a minute.
Mostly, it was clear to me that when ancient
Atlantis myths describe a two by two loading of the Ark, it truly,
flatly and clearly indicated to me the Double Helix patterns
in cell splitting Chromosome structure. There certainly was a
two by two but not exactly the way we imagine some Ark or big
ole fat boat. It was far more subtle.
For me, Noah and his escape with the form
and pattern of the future human model, was really a genetic lab
event, but with far more fluid etheric forces that predominated
in the Atlantean environment some 80,000 b.c.. Events that revealed
a conflict between Tao and Taotl when the Earth was still receptive
started to interfere with the structural outline of Nature and
the Human spirit.
There appeared to be a shattering drama that
rooted itself in the very AXIS of the Earth and how the future
of nature would arise. By attempting to mix, animal/human; plant/human;
and jar the platforms and staged levels of mineral, plant, animal
and human forms.. (Insect bridge between plant and animal) that
vital Earth disturbances, rooted in the attempts to hijack the
human form and nature from the prescribed god conditions and
the I AM form that the future Christ would wear, caused the sinking
of Atlantis and brought forward Noah's escape, or multi-Noahs,
escaping with the final product, the Chromosomal structure of
the defined Human Form.
So how do we picture a fantastic Science that
I just sketched, against how Science would find its way back
to such a shattering, amphibian idea and rekindle the debate
over how cloning and the human form is an ancient Atlantean resurfaced
idea in our Post Atlantean times?
http://www.nature.com/nsu/030714/030714-3.html
Frog eggs rejuvenate human
cells
Amphibian extract may take
adult DNA back to stem-cell state.
15 July 2003
HELEN R. PILCHER
Frog eggs: useful for finding
the genes involved in cell reprogramming.
Immature frog eggs can rejuvenate
adult human cells. Molecules in the amphibian nucleus coax mature
human and mouse DNA back to an adaptable, stem-cell-like state1.
John Gurdon and his colleagues
at Cambridge University, UK, hope to isolate the substances responsible
and use them to reprogramme ordinary adult cells, from skin or
blood, say. This would yield a limitless supply of donor-matched
stem cells with which to repair tissue damaged in diseases such
as Parkinson's and multiple sclerosis.
Many researchers are hoping
to convert specialized adult cells into a more immature state.
Stem cells can be derived from excess early-stage human embryos
from fertility treatments. But this approach has ethical and
practical limitations - the European Union last week ruled that
only embryos created before 27 June 2002 can be used for research.
Adult stem cells exist, but their potential is uncertain.
Gurdon's team injected immature
Xenopus frog eggs with nuclei from adult mouse or human white
blood cells. Two days later, the definitive mouse or human stem-cell
marker, a molecule called Oct4 RNA, appeared in the hybrid. RNA
helps to convert DNA to proteins, so the result hints that the
adult nuclei are starting to behave in a stem-cell-like way.
"This is the first step
in reprogramming cells," agrees developmental geneticist
Wolf Reik of the Babraham Institute in Cambridge, UK, before
adding: "You might still run into problems later on."
Some genes may remain in their adult form, causing cells to divide
and become cancerous.
Nuclear reaction
The technique is different
from the process used to create Dolly the sheep. To make Dolly,
researchers injected adult DNA into an empty sheep egg and stimulated
it to develop. Gurdon's approach leaves the egg's nucleus in
place.
When the researchers injected
the adult nuclei into frog egg nucleii, rather than into the
surrounding cytoplasm, Oct4 levels shot up by a factor of ten.
"The reprogramming activity is particularly concentrated
here," says Gurdon. Molecules in the frog nucleus may be
responsible for the eggs' revitalizing abilities, he speculates.
Frog eggs are large and easy
to manipulate, says cell biologist Rudolf Jaenisch of the Whitehead
Institute in Cambridge, Massachusetts. "They give you a
useful tool for finding the genes that are involved in reprogramming,"
he says.
References
Byrne, J. A., Simonsson, S., Western, P. S. & Gurdon, J.
B. Nuclei of adult mammalian somatic cells are directly reprogrammed
to oct-4 stem cells gene expression by amphibian oocytes. Current
Biology,
13, 1206 - 1213, (2003). |Homepage|
Bradford concludes;
How has Lytton's "Vril" given a
clue to this strange mystery? Please note Chapter 16 in "Vril"
the Power of the Coming Race.
"...The portrait of the
grandfather had the features and aspect of the philosopher, only
much more exaggerated: he was not dressed, and the colour of
his body was singular; the breast and stomach yellow, the shoulders
and legs of a dull bronze hue: the great-grandfather was a magnificent
specimen of the Batrachian genus, a Giant Frog, pur et simple.
Among the pithy sayings which,
according to tradition, the philosopher bequeathed to posterity
in rhythmical form and sententious brevity, this is notably recorded:
"Humble yourselves, my descendants; the father of your race
was a twat (tadpole): exalt yourselves, my descendants, for it
was the samd Divine Thought which created your father that develops
itself in exalting you."
Aph-Lin told me this fable
while I gazed on the three Batrachian portraits. I said in reply:
"You make a jest of my supposed ignorance and credulity
as an uneducated Tish, but though these horrible daubs may be
of great antiquity, and were intended, perhaps, for some rude
caricature, I presume that none of your race, even in the less
enlightened ages, ever believed that the great-grandson of a
Frog became a sententious philosopher; or that any section, I
will not say of the lofty Vril-ya, but of the meanest varieties
of the human race, had its origin in a Tadpole."
"Pardon me," answered
Aph-Lin: "in what we call the Wrangling or Philosophical
Period of History, which was at its height about seven thousand
years ago, there was a very distinguished naturalist, who proved
to the satisfaction of numerous disciples such analogical and
anatomical agreements in structure between an An and a Frog,
as to show that out of the one must have developed the other.
They had some diseases in common; they were both subject to the
same parasitical worms in the intestines; and, strange to say,
the An has, in his structure, a swimming-bladder, no longer of
any use to him, but which is a rudiment that clearly proves his
descent from a Frog. Nor is there any argument against this theory
to be found in the relative difference of size, for there are
still existent in our world Frogs of a size and stature not inferior
to our own, and many thousand years ago they appear to have been
still larger."
"I understand that,"
said I, "because Frogs thus enormous are, according to our
eminent geologists, who perhaps saw them in dreams, said to have
been distinguished inhabitants of the upper world before the
Deluge; and such Frogs are exactly the creatures likely to have
flourished in the lakes and morasses of your subterranean regions.
But pray, proceed."
"In the Wrangling Period
of History, whatever one sage asserted another sage was sure
to contradict. In fact, it was a maxim in that age, that the
human reason could only be sustained aloft by being tossed to
and fro in the perpetual motion of contradiction; and therefore
another sect of philosophers maintained the doctrine that the
An was not the descendant of the Frog, but that the Frog was
clearly the improved development of the An. The shape of the
Frog, taken generally, was much more symmetrical than that of
the An; beside the beautiful conformation of its lower limbs,
its flanks and shoulders, the majority of the Ana in that day
were almost deformed, and certainly ill-shaped. Again, the Frog
had the power to live alike on land and in water--a mighty privilege,
partaking of a spiritual essence denied to the An, since the
disuse of his swimming-bladder clearly proves his degeneration
from a higher development of species.
Again, the earlier races of
the Ana seem to have been covered with hair, and, even to a comparatively
recent date, hirsute bushes deformed the very faces of our ancestors,
spreading wild over their cheeks and chins, as similar bushes,
my poor Tish, spread wild over yours. But the object of the higher
races of the Ana through countless generations has been to erase
all vestige of connection with hairy vertebrata, and they have
gradually eliminated that debasing capillary excrement by the
law of sexual selection; the Gy-ei naturally preferring youth
or the beauty of smooth faces. But the degree of the Frog in
the scale of the vertebrata is shown in this, that he has no
hair at all, not even on his head. He was born to that hairless
perfection which the most beautiful of the Ana, despite the culture
of incalculable ages, have not yet attained.
The wonderful complication
and delicacy of a Frog's nervous system and arterial circulation
were shown by this school to be more susceptible of enjoyment
than our inferior, or at least simpler, physical frame allows
us to be. The examination of a Frog's hand, if I may use that
expression, accounted for its keener susceptibility to love,
and to social life in general. In fact, gregarious and amatory
as are the Ana, Frogs are still more so.
In short, these two schools
raged against each other; one asserting the An to be the perfected
type of the Frog; the other that the Frog was the highest development
of the An. The moralists were divided in opinion with the naturalists,
but the bulk of them sided with the Frog-preference school. They
said, with much plausibility, that in moral conduct (viz., in
the adherence to rules best adapted to the health and welfare
of the individual and the community) there could be no doubt
of the vast superiority of the Frog.
All history showed the wholesale
immorality of the human race, the complete disregard, even by
the most renowned among them, of the laws which they acknowledged
to be essential to their own and the general happiness and well-being.
But the severest critic of the Frog race could not detect in
their manners a single aberration from the moral law tacitly
recognised by themselves. And what, after all, can be the profit
of civilisation if superiority in moral conduct be not the aim
for which it strives, and the test by which its progress should
be judged?
"In fine, the adherents
to this theory presumed that in some remote period the Frog race
had been the improved development of the Human; but that, from
causes which defied rational conjecture, they had not maintained
their original position in the scale of nature; while the Ana,
though of inferior organisation, had, by dint less of their virtues
than their vices, such as ferocity and cunning, gradually acquired
ascendancy, much as among the human race itself tribes utterly
barbarous have, by superiority in similar vices, utterly destroyed
or reduced into insignificance tribes originally excelling them
in mental gifts and culture. Unhappily these disputes became
involved with the religious notions of that age; and as society
was then administered under the government of the Koom-Posh,
who, being the most ignorant, were of course the most inflammable
class--the multitude took the whole question out of the hands
of the philosophers; political chiefs saw that the Frog dispute,
so taken up by the populace, could become a most valuable instrument
of their ambition; and for not less than one thousand years war
and massacre prevailed, during which period the philosophers
on both sides were butchered, and the government of the Koom-Posh
itself was happily brought to an end by the ascendancy of a family
that clearly established its descent from the aboriginal tadpole,
and furnished despotic rulers to the various nations of the Ana.
These despots finally disappeared, at least from our communities,
as the discovery of vril led to the tranquil institutions under
which flourish all the races of the Vril-ya."
"And do no wranglers
or philosophers now exist to revive the dispute; or do they all
recognise the origin of your race in the tadpole?"
"Nay, such disputes,"
said Zee, with a lofty smile, "belong to the Pah-bodh of
the dark ages, and now only serve for the amusement of infants.
When we know the elements out of which our bodies are composed,
elements common to the humblest vegetable plants, can it signify
whether the All-Wise combined those elements out of one form
more than another, in order to create that in which He has placed
the capacity to receive the idea of Himself, and all the varied
grandeurs of intellect to which that idea gives birth? The An
in reality commenced to exist as An with the donation of that
capacity, and with that capacity, the sense to acknowledge that,
however through the countless ages his race may improve in wisdom,
it can never combine the elements at its command into the form
of a tadpole."
"You speak well, Zee,"
said Aph-Lin; "and it is enough for us short- lived mortals
to feel a reasonable assurance that whether the origin of the
An was a tadpole or not, he is no more likely to become a tadpole
again than the institutions of the Vril-ya are likely to relapse
into the heaving quagmire and certain strife-rot of a Koom-Posh."
Bradford concludes;
We wouldn't want to say what type of pre-historic
atavistic, pre- I AM Being might evolve out of the Eggs of human
genes and Frog eggs. Where would such a trail of science take
us? Would pre-I AM and the ancient conflict between the TAO of
Nature, Nature as fallen with four kingdoms, mineral, plant,
animal and human - the ancient contract of Newtonian Science
- The Rainbow Contract - after the flood, where our sense perceptions
were locked into our skulls, would these divine contracts be
reversed? Would an Atavistic pre-Christ clairvoyance take the
human form and consciousness back, over, somewhere over the Rainbow.
The Rainbow was our contract with God, that
no mass earth changes would arise as long as our sense system
sat in its 7 colored bow. But this rainbow was the cleared skies
over Atlantis and ancient clairvoyance set down into the pattern
of clear intellectual thinking capacity that has led us onward
through the Christ Event and the ancient cultural paradigms that
reveal just exactly how did Science arise? How did our Sense
perception get locked into the current clarity of dry intellectual
thought? How did Ahriman get mixed into the death forces of our
intellects? Will be get through this with Christ as a new value
added? Or will the majority of mankind choose the reverse door
to pre-Atlantean clairvoyance and dislodging the structure of
the skull, bone, skeletal system in favor of the more etheric
and amphibian ancestors?
...................................................................................................................................
From: VALENTINA BRUNETTI
Date: Sat Feb 7, 2004 11:01 am
Subject: R: [anthroposophy_tomorrow] gene pool and the Darwin
Award
Hi Bradford and all,
these thoughts about "the amphybian heritage"
are leading me to think about the strange biography and literary
work of Mr.H:P.Lovecraft.
He performed a "perfect" twisted
and darkly reinvented universe of "teosophic" insights
building a whole "spiritual" world where the gods are
idiot and the "spirit" in itself is the most perverted
and "worse than dead" matter you're able to imagine.
Consider also that, in everyday life, HPL
was a pathological materialist amd atheist.
Any thought about him?
Andrea the Italian
----- Original Message -----
From: holderlin66
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 9:28 PM
Subject: [anthroposophy_tomorrow] gene pool and the Darwin Award
Bradford comments;
be judged?
...................................................................................................................................
From: holderlin66
Date: Sat Feb 7, 2004 12:19 pm
Subject: gene pool and the Darwin Award/Andrea
--- In anthroposophy_tomorrow@yahoogroups.com,
VALENTINA BRUNETTI wrote:
HPL was a pathological materialist amd
atheist.
Any thought about him?
Andrea the Italian
"H. P. Lovecraft was strongly influenced,
not only by his mother but also by the books he read. ... At
five, he ... (read) ... a junior edition of The Arabian Nights.
He at once fell in love with the glories of medieval Islam and
spent hours playing Arab. ... One effect of dabbling in non-Christian
traditions was to make Lovecraft skeptical of the faith of his
fathers. Before he reached his fifth birthday anniversary, young
Lovecraft announced that he no longer believed in Santa Claus.
Further private thought convinced him that arguments for the
existence of God suffered the same weaknesses as those for Santa.
At five, Lovecraft was placed in the infant
class of the Sunday school of the venerable First Baptist Meeting
House on College Hill. The results were not what the elders expected.
When the feeding of Christian martyrs to the lions came up, Lovecraft
shocked the class by gleefully taking the side of the lions.
He wrote:
The absurdity of the myths I was called upon
to accept and the sombre greyness of the whole faith compared
with the Eastern magnificence of Mahometanism, made me definitely
an agnostic; and caused me to become so pestiferous a questioner
that I was permitted to discontinue attendance.
...... My grandfather had travelled observingly
through Italy, and delighted me with long, first-hand accounts
of its beauties and memorials of ancient grandeur. I mention
this aesthetic tendency in detail only to lead up to its philosophical
result - my last flickering of religious belief.
....... His skeptical view of the supernatural
- his nontheism - and his love of the Classical world were not
the only lasting passions formed in his childhood. .....
...... he embraced eighteenth-century rationalism,
which confirmed him in his atheistic materialism."
Marquis de Sade,
French libertine (1740-1814).
In his dialogue, Philosophy in the Bedroom,
de Sade insults and derides Christianity several times. In his
novel 120 Days of Sodom, he is quoted as saying "The idea
of God is the sole wrong for which I cannot forgive mankind."
Also, the "Dialogue Between a Priest and a Dying Man,"
which can be found online is clearly the work of someone with
contempt for religion.
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, German author
(1749-1832).
Stoutly anti-Christian, but not atheist.
"This occupation with ideas of immortality is for people
of rank, and especially for ladies who have nothing to do. But
a man of real worth who has something to do here, and must toil
and struggle to produce day by day, leaves the future world to
itself, and is active and useful in this."
Bradford comments;
The subject to me would be the clairvoyance
of hypocrisy. Christian hypocrisy and a real spiritual world,
blocked and roped off by Group and Collective hypocrisy is a
real encounter at the border of the I AM.
With H.P. Lovecraft, something was sinister
and behind the events of life, but how to digest the horror of
hypocrisy and the horror of understanding that "The Invasion
of the Body Snatchers" as an acute reference to exactly
how to copy the physical form and fully numb the I AM. How Ahrimanic
science has a model for replacing the I AM with a group belief
system and indeed a physical cloned core that is a replication
of the divine model of the Atlantean Logos bearer.
When we examine the sharp intellect of Rupert
Murdoch, and his vast intelligence, his cunning and sharpness
of thinking we come to an equally devastating meeting with icy
intelligence, sucked dry of the heart. Do we respect such ice
castle spires of intellect? Presently with our university training
we not only admire but we worship the Power of Intellect devoid
of heart. What does this say when we meet in WC or Anthro hawks
the same spiked intelligence? We meet the devastating aspects,
profiles in Intellectual Cunning on the precipice of Ahrimanic
ensoulment.
We are all fatally horrified and numbed that
we should and do encounter this in our own developments. We meet
this hypocrisy in all its horrific nightmare and we have different
reactions to it. We respect it. We wrangle with it in intellectual
combat, but we also must see just what a person of vast cultural
intelligence sees when they look into the icy stare of an Archai
of unique Cold Intellect that remains as a stunning profile of
Ahrimanic Intelligence. This type of study is part of the Micahel
School. Anyone who reads Rupert Murdoch is stunned by the sweeping
intellectual capacity and the tightrope walking of saying that
which appeals to the powers hidden in the hypocrisy of the intellect
that exists as a Cosmic Being. This being was also on the Altars
of Atlantis.
A being we can identify out of the Michael
School because in Cosmic Intelligence that has the full ramifications
of the liberated heart and Mind, The Christ Being and the mighty
human forces of the heart remains unified and cohesive to that
Intelligence. We come to note with care the meeting that souls
have with Raw, icy Intelligence and the difference in Warmed
Human Intelligence.
It is a horrific, Lovecraftian nightmare,
to realize that behind the threshold of consciousness we have
souls who torture and murder innocent souls and steal from them,
in their torture, rob through murder, future Angelic world thoughts.
Srategy and Robbery to cunningly outwit Michael Intelligence
in humanity also has an anti-Jungian primal horror to it.
Reading the headlines of the future where
GWB wins the election, having robbed forces by sending innocent
souls to their deaths, massive sub-Angelic Intelligence is downloaded
into the inspired minds of those running with the Ahrimanic creatures
corkscrewed deep into their intellects. High Priest Lovecraft
is a fine example of entering the primal goo of ancient Darwinian
consciousness and mixing it with Ahriman's primal clairvoyant
vision of the gods and all that has transpired to bring us from
primal events to the erect 33 notched spine of the encased physical
brain. Each Rupert is spiky spire and is worshipped in Karl Rove
schools of cunning.
Materialism and Clairvoyance has a very different
take on the St. John Gospel, where "In the Beginning was
the Word". Ahriman's gospel takes us to mighty nightmare
beasts before planning of MAN. Before the settling of the Logos
of the Cosmos. So the refined intellect, that nourishes itself
in the primal intelligence and torture of the Knights Templars;
to beating hearts removed on Aztec altars to children ripped
from their lives, media ooogling over the vision of the soul
who has just been murdered, we see with our eyes. But who do
such monsters serve? It is a Grail Question? Who do such intense
public visions of murder serve?
But what of those who must serve these dark
sinister forces of illness, disease and death after their deaths,
and are enchained by Intelligent brotherhoods acting behind the
scenes of consciousness who have no understanding of what the
difference is between Primal icy Intelligence and the beings,
that JIm Jones wise, brought human sacrifices before the communion
table of Ahrimanic feeding frenzy? Since when is this a Christian
world? What vital hypocrisy feeds our failure to see how souls
can be reached for and used after deeath? This number of 1998,
as you well know Andrea, is a prime number for tipping sub-angelic
Insights over to Ahrimanic Inspiration brilliant Intellects.
What iron inspirations do they draw from?
The bottom line is that the News we read and
the direction humanity is veering towards is loaded with sub-angelic
Inspiration bought from quarters of murderous soul robbery -
Is the fate and nightmare of what Michael Jackson has become
less of a menace than the Faces worn by those in Power today,
who feed off the communion table set by dark Ahrimanic deeds?
H.P. Lovecraft could be a living example of primal ahrimanic
clairvoyant beings that the dead are obliged to serve after their
fatal encounter, unprepared encounters, with vast Beings that
hypocrisy refuses to see.
This is what was incubated in Neitzsche's
psyche... and helped build the train tracks that loaded the cars
to chambers where living ash belched from factory like smelting
furnaces of an Industrial world nightmare. And everyone had a
hand in it. What could the clairvoyant see behind these gruesome
events. We could see that the surface army of Rupert Murdochs
and Neocons sup off the ripped away sub-angelic robbery, and
enslavement of murdered souls. We could also see a vital Michael
School serving behind the Threshold of our Consciousness today.
Giving us Angelic and Free inspiration to counteract the bitter
tragedy of Ahrimanic hypocrisy in the human soul.
Why was the Michael School burned and lifted
to the etheric worlds just behind the Threshold? So that Initiates
could fight the Primal Beasts that humanity is cultivating and
growing against the Humanized Reality of the Risen Etheric Christ
event.
From Primal goo and 8 foot frogs, with large
gooy eggs in gooy pods, Lytton could see the undensified etheric
Beings who were helping to design the future human form. The
enclosed skull form. This journey to the Golgotha Event of human
Intelligence and the Father, has allowed us to emancipate ourselves
from the primal beasts and ancient gods that haunt human consciousness.
Yet these stunning, alien cosmic broods of Primal forces haunt
and are in the hands of humans who worship the cunning coldness
of one of the worst Primal beings...and one who refused the path
of the Christ and Humanness.
It is good to be a hypocrite so that you don't
have to see that neighboring our Logos and Love imbued system
is another world waiting to engulf ours but is halted by the
heroism of human thinking and sacrifices of the deepest forces
of the heart.
Bradford
...................................................................................................................................
From: golden3000997
Date: Sat Feb 7, 2004 7:11 pm
Subject: Re: [anthroposophy_tomorrow] gene pool and the Darwin
Award/Andrea
How about Edward Gorey - "The Ghastlycrumb
Tinies?" : ) hee-hee.
I have his "Books, Cats, Life is Good"
coffee mug. Although, after what happened this morning, I'm not
so sure. : D
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Click to subscribe to anthroposophy_tomorrow
February/March
2004
The Uncle
Taz "Anthroposophy Tomorrow" Files
Anthroposophy & Anarchism
Anthroposophy & Scientology
Anthroposophical
Morsels
Anthroposophy,
Critics, and Controversy
